Compare Subaru Impreza 4 Hatchback vs Toyota Matrix E130 vs Subaru Impreza 5 Hatchback
Variants
1.6i AWD
1.6i AWD CVT
1.6i FWD
1.6i FWD CVT
2.0i AWD
2.0i AWD CVT
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS
1.6i CVT
2.0i CVT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
385 L / 13.6 cu-ft ~ 1310 L / 46.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.8 L / 5.1 qt
4.4 L / 4.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
12.9 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
25.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1540 mm / 60.6 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4350 mm / 171.3 in
4460 mm / 175.6 in
Size | Width
1740 mm / 68.5 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1515.0 mm / 59.6 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2645 mm / 104.1 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
650 kg / 1433 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol flat-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Type
Lineartronic
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2007
2016 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
42%
16%
32%
Pros
- Much sleeker styling
- Higher engine output
- Small turning circle
- Reliable engines
- Good front-end styling
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- No powerful engine options
- Bad CVT
- No powerful engine options
- Boring design
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Bad CVT
- Hybrid nonsense
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.