Compare Alfa Romeo Giulietta facelift vs Alfa Romeo MiTo vs Mazda 2 III
Variants
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 120 Euro6d
1.4 TB MultiAir 150
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120
1.6 MultiJet 120 TCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 170 Euro6d TCT
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 175 TCT
0.9 TwinAir 105
0.9 TwinAir 85
1.3 JTD 90
1.3 JTD 85
1.4
1.4 MPI
1.4 TB MultiAir 105
1.4 TB MultiAir 135
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 155
1.4 TB MultiAir 135 DCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170
1.6 JTD
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1495 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4351 mm / 171.3 in
4060 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1798 mm / 70.8 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheelbase
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
46%
25%
26%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Sweet design
- Low official fuel consumption
- Beautiful design
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Very low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- More emission nonsense causing reliability concerns
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Very tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.