HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift vs Peugeot 308 II vs Peugeot 208

Variants
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 VTi 82
1.5 BlueHDi 102 Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Euro6d AT
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99
1.6 e-HDI 115
1.6 HDI 92
1.6 PureTech 225 AT
1.6 THP 125
1.6 THP 156
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 150 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 177 AT
2.0 e-HDI 150
2.0 e-HDI 150 AT
GT 1.6 THP 205
GT 2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
GTi 263
GTi 250
GTi 270
1.0 PureTech
1.0 PureTech 2016+
1.0 VTi
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 110 AT
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d
1.2 PureTech 110 Euro6d AT
1.2 PureTech 82
1.2 PureTech 82 AT
1.2 PureTech 82 Euro6d
1.2 VTi 82
1.4 e-HDi
1.4 HDi
1.4 VTi 95
1.5 BlueHDi 102
1.6 BlueHDi 100
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 75
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92 5MT
1.6 e-HDi 92 6MT
1.6 THP 155
1.6 THP 208
1.6 VTi 120
GTi 200
GTi 208

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.4 m / 34.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
3-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
110 mm / 4.3 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4063 mm / 160.0 in
4253 mm / 167.4 in
Size | Width
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2511 mm / 98.9 in
2538 mm / 99.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
23%
21%
13%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Engine durability low
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.