Compare Mercedes A-Class W169 vs Alfa Romeo MiTo facelift vs Alfa Romeo Giulietta facelift

Variants
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
0.9 TwinAir 105
1.3 JTD 85
1.4 70
1.4 78
1.4 TB MultiAir 140 TCT
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.4 TB 120
1.4 TB 120 Euro6d
1.4 TB MultiAir 150
1.4 TB MultiAir 170 TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d
1.6 MultiJet 120 Euro6d TCT
1.6 MultiJet 120
1.6 MultiJet 120 TCT
1.75 TBi
2.0 MultiJet 170 Euro6d TCT
2.0 MultiJet 150
2.0 MultiJet 175 TCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1995 L / 70.5 cu-ft
270 L / 9.5 cu-ft
350 L / 12.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
3838 mm / 151.1 in
4063 mm / 160.0 in
4351 mm / 171.3 in
Size | Width
1764 mm / 69.4 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1483.0 mm / 58.4 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheelbase
2568 mm / 101.1 in
2511 mm / 98.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
1%
23%
46%
Pros
  • Three-pointed star
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Sweet design
Cons
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • No powerful engine options
  • Tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Low cargo capacity
  • More emission control systems to fail
  • More emission nonsense causing reliability concerns
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.