Compare Mercedes A-Class W169 vs Hyundai Accent 5 Hatchback vs Hyundai i20 II Coupe

Variants
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
1.6 GDI
1.6 GDI AT
1.6 DPi
1.6 DPi CVT
1.0 T-GDI
1.2
1.4
1.4 AT
1.4 CRDi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1995 L / 70.5 cu-ft
616 L / 21.8 cu-ft
336 L / 11.9 cu-ft ~ 1011 L / 35.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
421 kg / 928 lbs
423 kg / 933 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
8.4 m / 27.6 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
1449 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
3838 mm / 151.1 in
4185 mm / 164.8 in
4045 mm / 159.3 in
Size | Width
1764 mm / 69.4 in
1729 mm / 68.1 in
1730 mm / 68.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1513.0 mm / 59.6 in
Weight
1159.0 kg / 2555.2 lbs
1070.0 kg / 2358.9 lbs
Wheelbase
2568 mm / 101.1 in
2580 mm / 101.6 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
112 g/km
Fuel Economy
4.8 L/100km / 49.0 MPG (combined) | 6.0 L/100km / 39.2 MPG (urban) | 4.1 L/100km / 57.4 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
450 kg / 992 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1110 kg / 2447 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
75.6 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Stroke
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
1%
15%
17%
Pros
  • Three-pointed star
  • Very small turning circle
  • Small turning circle
  • Sleek styling
Cons
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Bland in styling
  • Low build quality
  • Slow and sluggish
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Poor durability

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.