HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes A-Class W169 vs Renault Megane 3 Coupe vs Renault Clio III

Variants
A 150
A 150 CVT
A 160 CDI
A 160 CDI CVT
A 170
A 170 CVT
A 180 CDI
A 180 CDI CVT
A 200
A 200 CDI
A 200 CDI CVT
A 200 CVT
A 200 Turbo
A 200 Turbo CVT
1.2 TCe 115
1.2 TCe 132 AT
1.2 TCe 132
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 110 CVT
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.6 110
1.6 dCi 130
1.6 dCi 130 Euro6
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
1.2 TCe 115
2.0 dCi 160
2.0 dCi 165
2.0 TCe 180
2.0 TCe 190
2.0 TCe 220
RS 265
RS 250
RS Trophy
RS Trophy-R
1.2 59
1.2 75
1.2 75 AT
1.2 78 AT
1.2 TCe
1.2i 101
1.2i 65
1.4 98
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 75
1.5 dCi 86
1.5 dCi 86 AT
1.6 110
1.6 110 AT
1.6 88
2.0 138
2.0 138 AT
2.0 197
RS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1995 L / 70.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
54.0 L / 14.3 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent
Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Construction

Body Style
5-door Hatchback
3-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Length
3838 mm / 151.1 in
4299 mm / 169.3 in
Size | Width
1764 mm / 69.4 in
Wheelbase
2568 mm / 101.1 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.1 m / 121.7 ft
CO2 Emission
137 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.34
Towing Capacity
535 kg / 1179 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
1%
37%
9%
Pros
  • Three-pointed star
  • Interesting Megane RS
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Poor engine options
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • CVT
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Great insult to the Mercedes name
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Awkward styling
  • Poor interiors
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Unreliable transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.