Compare Mercedes B-Class W246 vs Renault Modus vs Renault Grand Modus
Variants
B 160 CDI
B 160 CDI DCT
B 180
B 180 DCT
B 180 CDI (OM651)
B 180 CDI (OM651) DCT
B 180 CDI (OM607)
B 180 CDI (OM607) DCT
B 200
B 200 DCT
B 200 CDI
B 200 CDI DCT
B 220 4MATIC DCT
B 220 CDI DCT
B 250 DCT
1.2 TCe
1.2
1.4
1.5 dCi 103
1.5 dCi 106
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86
1.6 112
1.6 112 AT
1.6 88
1.2
1.2 TCe
1.5 dCi 103 AT
1.5 dCi 68
1.5 dCi 86 5MT
1.5 dCi 86 6MT
1.6 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1547 L / 54.6 cu-ft
305 L / 10.8 cu-ft ~ 1454 L / 51.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
51.0 L / 13.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Trailing arm
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
5-door Hatchback
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
120 mm / 4.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Height
1557 mm / 61.3 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
1589 mm / 62.6 in
Size | Length
4359 mm / 171.6 in
4034 mm / 158.8 in
Size | Width
1709 mm / 67.3 in | 1960 mm / 77.2 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1472.0 mm / 58.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
1450.0 mm / 57.1 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2482 mm / 97.7 in
2575 mm / 101.4 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
695 kg / 1532 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1400 kg / 3086 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
73.7 mm / 2.9 in
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
24%
6%
3%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Less ugly than before
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Basic suspension setup
- Poor fit and finish
- Rather bad design
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.