Compare Renault Captur vs Peugeot 5008 II facelift vs Peugeot 2008

Variants
TCe 90
TCe 120 AT
TCe 120
TCe 120 AT Stop&Start
TCe 130
dCi 110
dCi 110 Euro6b
dCi 90 AT
dCi 90 Euro6b
dCi 90 Euro6b AT
dCi 90
TCe 150
TCe 150 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
702 L / 24.8 cu-ft ~ 2150 L / 75.9 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
56.0 L / 14.8 gal
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
28.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Elastic beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
170 mm / 6.7 in
236 mm / 9.3 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1646 mm / 64.8 in
1556 mm / 61.3 in
Size | Length
4122 mm / 162.3 in
4641 mm / 182.7 in
4159 mm / 163.7 in
Size | Width
1844 mm / 72.6 in
1739 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
1601.0 mm / 63.0 in
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1516.0 mm / 59.7 in
1610.0 mm / 63.4 in
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in
Wheelbase
2606 mm / 102.6 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2537 mm / 99.9 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
76.0 mm / 3.0 in
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
16.0:1
Engine | Stroke
80.5 mm / 3.2 in
90.5 mm / 3.6 in

Production

Availability
2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
1%
24%
2%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Decent styling
  • High cargo capacity
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to fix
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Both ugly and forgettable
  • Poor performance
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Very ugly indeed
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.