Compare Peugeot 2008 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Peugeot 508 RXH
Variants
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
2.0 BlueHDi AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AT
2.0 HDi Hybrid AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
15.6 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
19.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
184 mm / 7.2 in
Size | Height
1556 mm / 61.3 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4159 mm / 163.7 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
Size | Width
1739 mm / 68.5 in
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1592.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
1564.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2537 mm / 99.9 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2815 mm / 110.8 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
5.0 km / 3.1 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
DW10CTED4
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
85.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1997.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
88.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
2%
27%
25%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Easy to fix
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Not very ugly
Cons
- Very ugly indeed
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Uglier than the standard 508 SW
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.