Compare Peugeot 2008 vs Range Rover Evoque L551 vs Peugeot 3008 II
Variants
1.2 e-HTP
1.2 e-VTi AT
1.2 VTi
1.4 HDi
1.6 BlueHDi
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 92
1.6 e-HDi 92 AT
1.6 VTi
D165 AWD
D165 MT
D200 AWD
P160
P300e AWD
1.2 130 AT
1.2 130
1.5 HDi 130 AT
1.5 HDi 130
1.6 HDi 100
1.6 HDi 120 AT
1.6 HDi 120
1.6 180 AT
1.6 PHEV
1.6 THP 165 AT
2.0 HDi 150
GT 2.0 HDi 177
GT 2.0 HDi 180
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
591 L / 20.9 cu-ft ~ 1383 L / 48.8 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1482 L / 52.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
578 kg / 1274 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 349 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
20.0 deg
Offroad | Climb Angle
45.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
30.6 deg
29.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring
Tire Size
225/65 R17, 235/65 R17, 235/60 R18, 235/50 R20, 245/45 R21
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
212 mm / 8.3 in
219 mm / 8.6 in
Size | Height
1556 mm / 61.3 in
1649 mm / 64.9 in
Size | Length
4159 mm / 163.7 in
4371 mm / 172.1 in
4447 mm / 175.1 in
Size | Width
1739 mm / 68.5 in
1841 mm / 72.5 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1488.0 mm / 58.6 in
Wheelbase
2537 mm / 99.9 in
2681 mm / 105.6 in
2675 mm / 105.3 in
Performance
Electric Range
68.0 km / 42.3 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Stroke
92.3 mm / 3.6 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
2%
27%
21%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Easy to fix
- Some offroad capabilities
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Low fuel consumption
Cons
- Very ugly indeed
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
- Very ugly
- FWD-based
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- No independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.