Compare Nissan Juke vs Renault Captur vs Renault Koleos

Renault Captur / Kaptur (J87) Crossover (2013-2019)

Renault Koleos / Samsung QM5 (HY) Crossover (2008-2016)

Nissan | Cars

Renault | Cars

Variants

1.2 DIG-T

1.5 dCi

1.5 dCi Euro6

1.5 dCi Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT

1.6 117PS

1.6 117PS CVT

1.6 94PS Euro6

1.6 94PS

1.6 DIG-T

1.6 DIG-T CVT

1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT

Nismo

Nismo AWD CVT

Nismo RS AWD CVT

Nismo RS

TCe 90

TCe 120 AT

TCe 120

TCe 120 AT Stop&Start

TCe 130

dCi 110

dCi 110 Euro6b

dCi 90 AT

dCi 90 Euro6b

dCi 90 Euro6b AT

dCi 90

TCe 150

TCe 150 AT

2.0 dCi 150

2.0 dCi 150 4x4

2.0 dCi 150 4x4 AT

2.0 dCi 150 Euro5

2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4

2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4 AT

2.0 dCi 173 4x4

2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4

2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4 AT

2.0 dCi 175 Euro5 4x4

2.5 170

2.5 170 4x4

2.5 170 4x4 CVT

2.5 170 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1380 L / 48.7 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

45.0 L / 11.9 gal

65.0 L / 17.2 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Offroad | Approach Angle

22.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

25.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Semi-independent, Elastic beam

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

170 mm / 6.7 in

Size | Height

1695 mm / 66.7 in

Size | Length

4122 mm / 162.3 in

4520 mm / 178.0 in

Track Width | Front

1531.0 mm / 60.3 in

1545.0 mm / 60.8 in

Track Width | Rear

1516.0 mm / 59.7 in

1550.0 mm / 61.0 in

Wheelbase

2530 mm / 99.6 in

2606 mm / 102.6 in

2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.35

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

76.0 mm / 3.0 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

16.0:1

Engine | Stroke

80.5 mm / 3.2 in

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score

23%

Pros

So ugly it's endearing

Low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Relatively adequate engines

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Horrible Renault engines
Bad CVT

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with tiny engines
No independent rear suspensions
Both ugly and forgettable

Bad 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.