Compare Nissan Juke vs Nissan Qashqai 2 vs Nissan Qashqai 3

Nissan Qashqai 2 (J11) Crossover (2013-2020)

Nissan | Cars

Variants

1.2 DIG-T

1.5 dCi

1.5 dCi Euro6

1.5 dCi Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d

1.6 113PS Euro6d CVT

1.6 117PS

1.6 117PS CVT

1.6 94PS Euro6

1.6 94PS

1.6 DIG-T

1.6 DIG-T CVT

1.6 DIG-T AWD CVT

Nismo

Nismo AWD CVT

Nismo RS AWD CVT

Nismo RS

1.2

1.2 Euro6

1.2 CVT

1.2 Euro6 CVT

1.3 140

1.3 160

1.3 160 DCT

1.5 dCi 110 Euro6

1.5 dCi 110

1.5 dCi 115

1.5 dCi 115 DCT

1.6 dCi

1.6 dCi Euro6

1.6 dCi AWD

1.6 dCi Euro6 AWD

1.6 dCi CVT

1.6 dCi Euro6 CVT

1.6

1.7 dCi

1.7 dCi AWD

1.7 dCi AWD CVT

1.3 140

1.3 158

1.3 AWD CVT

1.3 CVT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

22.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

25.0 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent, Torsion beam

Turning Circle

10.7 m / 35.1 ft

10.7 m / 35.2 ft

11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

5-door mild-hybrid Crossover

Platform

Nissan CMF-C platform

Dimensions

Size | Height

1625 mm / 64.0 in

Size | Length

4425 mm / 174.2 in

Size | Width

1835 mm / 72.2 in | 2084 mm / 82.0 in (mirror unfolded)

Track Width | Front

1580.0 mm / 62.2 in

Track Width | Rear

1560.0 mm / 61.4 in

1586.0 mm / 62.4 in

Wheelbase

2530 mm / 99.6 in

2646 mm / 104.2 in

2665 mm / 104.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag

0.35

0.33

Powertrain

Emission Standard

EURO 6d-ISC-FCM

Engine | Bore

72.2 mm / 2.8 in

Engine | Compression Ratio

10.5:1

Engine | Displacement

1.3 L / 81.3 cu-in / 1332.0 cc

Engine | Stroke

81.3 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Type

Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 engine with 4 values per cylinder

Transmission | Gears

6-speed

Production

Availability

2021

Debut

2021-02-18

Made In

Reviews

Neofiliac score

14%

Pros

So ugly it's endearing

Low official fuel consumption
Not very ugly

Cheap to buy

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions
Horrible Renault engines
Bad CVT

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Unreliable engines and CVT
No independent rear suspensions

Very ugly
Horrible build quality
Horrible 0-100kph time
Only available with tiny engines
Waste of raw materials

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.