HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo XC60 II vs Renault Captur 2 vs Renault Koleos

Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.0 TCe 100
1.0 TCe 91
1.3 TCe 130 DCT
1.3 TCe 130
1.3 TCe 140
1.3 TCe 140 AT
1.3 TCe 154 AT
1.5 dCi 115
1.5 dCi 115 AT
1.5 dCi 95
E-TECH 143
E-TECH 160
2.0 dCi 150
2.0 dCi 150 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 150 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 173 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4
2.0 dCi 173 Euro5 4x4 AT
2.0 dCi 175 Euro5 4x4
2.5 170
2.5 170 4x4
2.5 170 4x4 CVT
2.5 170 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
450 L / 15.9 cu-ft ~ 1380 L / 48.7 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
18.8 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in
Size | Length
4227 mm / 166.4 in
4520 mm / 178.0 in
Track Width | Front
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2639 mm / 103.9 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
57%
3%
23%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Relatively adequate engines
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Very ugly
  • Poor build quality
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.