Compare Volvo XC60 II vs Toyota RAV4 IV vs Toyota Venza AV10
Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
2.0 151 AWD
2.0 151 AWD CVT
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD
2.0 151 Euro6 AWD CVT
2.0D 124
2.0D 124 AWD
2.0D 143
2.2D AWD
2.2D AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AT
2.5 AWD AT
2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid AWD
2.7
2.7 AT
2.7 AWD
2.7 AWD AT
3.5
3.5 AT
3.5 AWD
3.5 AWD AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.8 L / 7.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
67.0 L / 17.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Multi-link
Independent, spring
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
18.8 kWh (gross)
1.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
Toyota K
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1610 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
4801 mm / 189.0 in
Size | Width
1905 mm / 75.0 in
Track Width | Front
1631.0 mm / 64.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1636.0 mm / 64.4 in
Weight
1835.0 kg / 4045.5 lbs
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
95.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
95.0 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic
Production
Availability
2017
2008 ~ 2012
Reviews
Neofiliac score
57%
45%
24%
Pros
- Much improved design
- Some offroad capabilities
- Wonderful interior appointments
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good fuel economy
- High reliaiblity
- High cargo capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Rather good exterior design (for what it is)
- Exceptionally reliable powertrain
- Great fit and finish
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable engines
- PHEV nonsense
- Slow and sluggish
- Ugly front-end
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Half crossover, half station wagon
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.