HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo XC60 II vs Citroen C4 Cactus vs Citroen C5 Aircross

Variants
T4
T5 AWD
T5
T6 AWD
D4 AWD
D4
D5 AWD
T8 Polestar
1.2 e-THP 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS AT
1.2 PureTech 75PS
1.2 PureTech 82PS
1.2 PureTech 82PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS AT
1.6 e-HDI 92PS AT
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.6 PureTech 180 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
348 L / 12.3 cu-ft ~ 1170 L / 41.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
21.0 deg
20.0 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
19.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
23.0 deg
27.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer, Leaf spring
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.7 m / 35.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
18.8 kWh (gross)
13.2 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Platform
PSA PF1

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
216 mm / 8.5 in
230 mm / 9.1 in
Size | Height
1658 mm / 65.3 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4157 mm / 163.7 in
Size | Width
1729 mm / 68.1 in | 1946 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheelbase
2865 mm / 112.8 in
2595 mm / 102.2 in
2730 mm / 107.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
0.32
Electric Range
18.6 km / 11.6 mi
50.0 km / 31.1 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
11.0:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Geartronic

Production

Availability
2017
2014 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
57%
3%
15%
Pros
  • Much improved design
  • Some offroad capabilities
  • Wonderful interior appointments
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Decent engine reliability
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Unreliable engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor performance
  • Ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.