HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Citroen C4 Cactus vs Peugeot 2008 II vs Citroen C4 III

Variants
1.2 e-THP 110PS
1.2 PureTech 110PS AT
1.2 PureTech 75PS
1.2 PureTech 82PS
1.2 PureTech 82PS AT
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS
1.6 BlueHDi 99PS AT
1.6 e-HDI 92PS AT
1.2 PureTech 100
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 100
1.5 BlueHDi 130 AT
e-2008
1.2 PureTech 102
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.2 PureTech 155 AT
1.5 HDi 110
1.5 HDi 130 AT
e-C4

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
348 L / 12.3 cu-ft ~ 1170 L / 41.3 cu-ft
405 L / 14.3 cu-ft ~ 1467 L / 51.8 cu-ft
380 L / 13.4 cu-ft ~ 1250 L / 44.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, coil spring
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.4 m / 34.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
50.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Crossover
Platform
PSA PF1

Dimensions

Size | Height
1490 mm / 58.7 in
1550 mm / 61.0 in
Size | Length
4157 mm / 163.7 in
4300 mm / 169.3 in
Size | Width
1729 mm / 68.1 in | 1946 mm / 76.6 in (mirror unfolded)
1770 mm / 69.7 in | 1987 mm / 78.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1815 mm / 71.5 in (mirror folded)
1800 mm / 70.9 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded) | 1834 mm / 72.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1477.0 mm / 58.1 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Wheelbase
2595 mm / 102.2 in
2605 mm / 102.6 in
2670 mm / 105.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32
Electric Range
330.0 km / 205.1 mi
Towing Capacity
1200 kg / 2646 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6d-TEMP
Engine | Bore
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
75.0 mm / 3.0 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1

Production

Availability
2014 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
21%
15%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low fuel consumption
Cons
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions
  • Poor performance
  • Low build quality
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Horrible performance
  • Only available with tiny engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Crossover nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.