Compare Chevrolet Traverse vs Cadillac XT4 vs Chevrolet Equinox 3
Variants
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
AWD
FWD
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
637 L / 22.5 cu-ft ~ 1385 L / 48.9 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
9.4 L / 9.9 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
5.0 L / 5.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
235/60 R18
Turning Circle
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
172 mm / 6.8 in
Size | Height
1627 mm / 64.1 in
Size | Length
4599 mm / 181.1 in
Size | Width
1947 mm / 76.7 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1605.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1603.0 mm / 63.1 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
18 in
Wheelbase
2779 mm / 109.4 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
1587 kg
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
LSY
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
2.0 L / 121.9 cu-in / 1998.0 cc
Engine | Power
241.0 hp / 179.7 kW @ 5000 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
120.6 hp/L / 2.0 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
350 Nm / 258.1 lb-ft @ 1500-4000 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Turbocharged direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Final Drive
3.47
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
9-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Automatic
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2017
2019
Debut
2018 New York Auto Show
Made In
US: Kansas; China: Shanghai
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
37%
19%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
- Good styling
- Comfortable interior
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very bland, unfinished styling
- No powerful engine options
- Poser crossover
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.