Compare Acura ZDX vs Chevrolet Captiva vs Chevrolet Equinox 2
Variants
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
2.4 Euro6
2.4 Euro6 AWD
2.4
2.4 AWD
3.0
3.0 AWD
3.6
3.6 AWD
3.6 Euro6
3.6 Euro6 AWD
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
779 L / 27.5 cu-ft ~ 1971 L / 69.6 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
79.5 L / 21.0 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
P255/50 R19 103H
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
12.2 m / 40.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Size | Height
1596 mm / 62.8 in
Size | Length
4887 mm / 192.4 in
4770 mm / 187.8 in
Size | Width
1995 mm / 78.5 in
Track Width | Front
1720.0 mm / 67.7 in
1598.0 mm / 62.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1719.0 mm / 67.7 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Weight
2019.0 kg / 4451.1 lbs
Wheel Size
8.5J x 19
Wheelbase
2750 mm / 108.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38
Fuel Economy
12.4 L/100km / 19.0 MPG (combined) | 14.7 L/100km / 16.0 MPG (urban) | 10.2 L/100km / 23.1 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Engine
J37A5
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Power
300.0 hp / 223.7 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Torque
366 Nm / 269.9 lb-ft @ 4500 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2013
Reviews
Neofiliac score
13%
45%
37%
Pros
- Reliable V6 engine
- Reasonable drivetrain reliability
- Good towing capacity
- Much improved exterior styling
- Decent drivetrain reliability
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Rather ugly and pointless
- Very ugly
- Bad 0-100kph time
- High 0.38 drag coefficient
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Falsely marketed as SUV
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.