Compare Alfa Romeo 159 Sportwagon vs Volvo V60 facelift vs Alfa Romeo 156 Sportwagon

Variants
1.75 TBi
1.8 MPI
1.9 JTDM 16V
1.9 JTDM 16V AT
1.9 JTDM 8V
1.9 JTS
2.0 JTDM 136PS
2.0 JTDM 170PS
2.2 JTS
2.2 JTS Selespeed
2.4 JTDM 200PS
2.4 JTDM 200PS AT
2.4 JTDM 210PS
2.4 JTDM 210PS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS
3.2 V6 JTS Q4
3.2 V6 JTS Q4 AT
D2
D2
D2 AT
D2 AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
D5 231PS AWD Hybrid
D6 285PS AWD Hybrid
D6 288PS AWD Hybrid
Polestar 2.0 T6 AWD AT
Polestar 3.0 T6 AWD AT
T2 AT
T3 150PS
T3 150PS AT
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 240PS AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 2.0 AT
T6 2.0 AWD AT
T6 3.0 AWD AT
1.6 TS
1.8 TS
1.9 JTD 140
1.9 JTD 105
1.9 JTD 115
2.0 TS
2.0 JTS
2.4 JTD 136
2.4 JTD 150
2.4 JTD 175
2.5 V6 190
2.5 V6 190 AT
2.5 V6 192
2.5 V6 192 AT
2.5 V6 190 AT
3.2 GTA

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
360 L / 12.7 cu-ft ~ 1180 L / 41.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1417 mm / 55.8 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4660 mm / 183.5 in
4635 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1828 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1578.0 mm / 62.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1555.0 mm / 61.2 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2595 mm / 102.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
46%
37%
33%
Pros
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Potent engines
  • Still elegant
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Nice Polestar exterior design
  • Very handsome styling
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Beautiful design (though less so than the sedan)
  • Good handling
  • Superb GTA
Cons
  • Not as good-looking as the sedan
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Losing I5 and I6 engines
  • Lowered engine reliability
  • Outdated automatic transmission

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.