Compare Kia Optima Sportswagon vs Skoda Octavia 3 Scout vs Skoda Superb B8 Combi facelift

Variants
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi DCT
1.7 CRDi
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL Euro6d
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 CVVL Euro6d AT
2.0 GDI PHEV
2.0 GDI Euro6d PHEV
GT Euro6d AT
GT AT
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
1.6 TDI 120 DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
PHEV

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
610 L / 21.5 cu-ft ~ 1740 L / 61.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
7.8 L / 8.2 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
570 kg / 1257 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.4 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
225/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.3 m / 33.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.3 kWh (gross) | 9.0 kWh (net)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1531 mm / 60.3 in
Size | Length
4855 mm / 191.1 in
4685 mm / 184.4 in
4862 mm / 191.4 in
Size | Width
1814 mm / 71.4 in
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1538.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1506.0 mm / 59.3 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17
Wheelbase
2805 mm / 110.4 in
2679 mm / 105.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Electric Range
62.0 km / 38.5 mi

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), All-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine
G4NG
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2013 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
50%
28%
39%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low official fuel consumption
  • Rather good-looking
  • Small turning circle
  • Looks better than before
  • Decent styling
  • Low fuel consumption
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.