Compare Ford Focus 3 Wagon facelift vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon facelift

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS
1.0 EcoBoost 110PS stop&start
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS
1.0 EcoBoost 125PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS
1.5 EcoBoost 150PS stop&start
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS
1.5 EcoBoost 182PS stop&start
1.5 TDCi 120PS
1.5 TDCi 95PS
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi 115PS
1.6 TDCi 115PS stop&start
1.6 TDCi 95PS
1.6 TDCi 95PS stop&start
1.6 Ti-VCT 105PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS
1.6 Ti-VCT 125PS AT
1.6 Ti-VCT 85PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT stop&start
2.0 TDCi 150PS stop&start
Focus ST
Focus ST Diesel
Focus ST stop&start
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 iVCT 187 Hybrid

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
476 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 1502 L / 53.0 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
730 L / 25.8 cu-ft ~ 1605 L / 56.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2648 mm / 104.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
400 kg / 882 lbs (w/o brakes) | 400 kg / 882 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Euro 6d
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018
2019 ~ 2022

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
30%
32%
Pros
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Higher output engines made available
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Decent interior appointment
  • Decent build quality
  • Independent rear suspensions
Cons
  • Further downsized engine lineup
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.