Compare Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon facelift
Variants
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost AT
1.5 TDCi
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi
1.6 TDCi ECOnetic
2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD
2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS
2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 180PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT
2.0 TDCi 210PS AT
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.5 EcoBoost 165
1.5 EcoBoost 165 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 120
2.0 EcoBlue 150
2.0 EcoBlue 150 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AT
2.0 EcoBlue 190 AWD AT
2.0 iVCT 187 Hybrid
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
730 L / 25.8 cu-ft ~ 1605 L / 56.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
10.5 L / 11.1 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1501 mm / 59.1 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1501 mm / 59.1 in
Size | Length
4867 mm / 191.6 in
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1911 mm / 75.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Euro 6d
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Production
Availability
2015 ~ 2018
2019 ~ 2022
Reviews
Neofiliac score
32%
30%
32%
Pros
- Low official fuel consumption
- Improved styling
- Very low fuel consumption
- Superb reliability
- More modern design
- Decent interior appointment
- Decent build quality
- Independent rear suspensions
Cons
- Engines are too small
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Poor handling
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.