HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Mondeo 4 Wagon vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Ford Mondeo 2 Wagon

Variants
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost
1.5 EcoBoost AT
1.5 TDCi
1.5 TDCi ECOnetic
1.6 TDCi
1.6 TDCi ECOnetic
2.0 EcoBoost 203PS AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240PS AT
2.0 TDCi 150PS
2.0 TDCi 150PS AWD
2.0 TDCi 150PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 150PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS
2.0 TDCi 180PS ECOnetic
2.0 TDCi 180PS AT
2.0 TDCi 180PS AWD AT
2.0 TDCi 210PS AT
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.8 110PS
1.8 125PS
2.0 145PS
2.0 145PS AT
2.0 TDCi 130PS
2.0 TDCi 130PS AT
2.0D 115PS
2.0D 115PS AT
2.0D 90PS
2.2 TDCi 155PS
2.5 170PS
2.5 170PS AT
3.0 204PS
ST220

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
488 L / 17.2 cu-ft ~ 1585 L / 56.0 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1700 L / 60.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Helical spring
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1501 mm / 59.1 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1441 mm / 56.7 in
Size | Length
4867 mm / 191.6 in
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4804 mm / 189.1 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
6.5J x 16
16 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
32%
30%
23%
Pros
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Clean and simple styling
  • Decent reliability record
Cons
  • Engines are too small
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.