Compare Alpina B3 Touring E46 vs Opel Vectra C Caravan vs Opel Insignia A Sports Tourer
Variants
B3 3.3
B3 3.3 Allrad AT
B3 3.3 AT
B3 S
1.6
1.8 122PS
1.8 122PS AT
1.8 140PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 DTI
2.0 Turbo
2.2 DTI
2.2 DTI AT
2.2 DIRECT
2.2 DIRECT Automatic
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 250PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.2 211PS AT
3.2 211PS
OPC 2.8 Turbo
1.4 T 140PS
1.6 115PS
1.6 T 180PS
1.8 140PS
2.0 BiTurbo CDTI
2.0 BiTurbo CDTI AT
2.0 CDTI 110PS
2.0 CDTI 130PS
2.0 CDTI 130PS AT
2.0 T 220PS
2.0 T 220PS 4x4
2.0 T 220PS 4x4 AT
2.0 T 220PS AT
2.0 T 220PS Ethanol
2.0 T 250PS 4x4
2.0 T 250PS 4x4 AT
2.8 T 260PS 4x4
2.8 T 260PS 4x4 AT
OPC 2.8 T 325PS 4x4
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
435 L / 15.4 cu-ft ~ 1345 L / 47.5 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1850 L / 65.3 cu-ft
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1530 L / 54.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
63.0 L / 16.6 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Multi-link
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
GM Epsilon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1409 mm / 55.5 in
Size | Length
4478 mm / 176.3 in
Size | Width
1739 mm / 68.5 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1471.0 mm / 57.9 in
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1481.0 mm / 58.3 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheelbase
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in
2737 mm / 107.8 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
222 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.2:1
Engine | Stroke
93.8 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
75%
27%
39%
Pros
- Very beautiful
- Rather reliable and easy to DIY
- Great handling
- Better-looking than the sedan
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Rather handsome design
Cons
- Started AWD nonsense
- MacPherson front suspension
- Semi-independent suspensions in the rear
- Use of CVT
- Stuck with MacPherson front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.