Compare Volvo V70 III facelift vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Toyota Mark II Blit

Variants
D2
D2 AT
D3
D3 AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD AT
D5
D5 AT
D5 AWD AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 AWD AT
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
2.5iR-S
2.5iR-V

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
555 L / 19.6 cu-ft ~ 1580 L / 55.8 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
151 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1547 mm / 60.9 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4814 mm / 189.5 in
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4775 mm / 188.0 in
Size | Width
1907 mm / 75.1 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1475.0 mm / 58.1 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2816 mm / 110.9 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in

Performance

Fuel Economy
10.8 L/100km / 21.8 MPG (urban)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Engine | Bore
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Stroke
71.5 mm / 2.8 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018
2002 ~ 2006

Reviews

Neofiliac score
60%
30%
39%
Pros
  • Good engine lineup remained available
  • Cleaner, more imposing design
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Clean styling
  • Wonderful range of I6 engines
  • Robust powertrain
  • Double-wishbone suspensions all around
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Not built for luxury
  • Somehow reminds one of a hearse

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.