Compare Volvo V60 facelift vs Peugeot 308 SW III vs Peugeot 508 SW

Variants
D2
D2
D2 AT
D2 AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
D5 231PS AWD Hybrid
D6 285PS AWD Hybrid
D6 288PS AWD Hybrid
Polestar 2.0 T6 AWD AT
Polestar 3.0 T6 AWD AT
T2 AT
T3 150PS
T3 150PS AT
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 240PS AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 2.0 AT
T6 2.0 AWD AT
T6 3.0 AWD AT
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
1.6 e-HDi
1.6 HDi
1.6 THP
1.6 THP AT
1.6 VTi
2.0 HDi 140PS
2.0 HDi 163PS
2.0 HDi 163PS AT
2.2 HDi AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
560 L / 19.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
11.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1444 mm / 56.9 in
1476 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
4813 mm / 189.5 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2732 mm / 107.6 in
2817 mm / 110.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.277
Towing Capacity
1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Production

Availability
2021
2010 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
31%
21%
Pros
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Nice Polestar exterior design
  • Very handsome styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Improved styling
  • Much better-looking than the 407 SW
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Losing I5 and I6 engines
  • Lowered engine reliability
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor suspension setup
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.