Compare Volvo V60 facelift vs Volvo V50 facelift vs Volvo V50
Variants
D2
D2
D2 AT
D2 AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
D5 231PS AWD Hybrid
D6 285PS AWD Hybrid
D6 288PS AWD Hybrid
Polestar 2.0 T6 AWD AT
Polestar 3.0 T6 AWD AT
T2 AT
T3 150PS
T3 150PS AT
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 240PS AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 2.0 AT
T6 2.0 AWD AT
T6 3.0 AWD AT
1.6
1.6D DRIVe
1.6D DRIVe start/stop
1.8F Flexifuel
2.0D
2.0F Flexifuel
2.4
D5 AT
D5
2.4i AT
2.4i
T5 AT
T5 AWD AT
T5 AWD
T5
1.6D
1.6
1.8
2.0D
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4i
2.4i AT
T5
T5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
417 L / 14.7 cu-ft
417 L / 14.7 cu-ft ~ 1307 L / 46.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
205/55 R16
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.2 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1457 mm / 57.4 in
1452 mm / 57.2 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
4522 mm / 178.0 in
4514 mm / 177.7 in
Size | Width
1845 mm / 72.6 in
1770 mm / 69.7 in
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1531.0 mm / 60.3 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
16 in
15 in
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
2640 mm / 103.9 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Top Speed
235.0 km/h / 146.0 mph
Towing Capacity
1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1500 kg / 3307 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Reviews
Neofiliac score
37%
34%
28%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Nice Polestar exterior design
- Very handsome styling
- More elegant styling
- Good T5 and D5 engines
- New R-Design trim
- Down to very low fuel consumption
- Clean and simple design
- Rather reliable drivetrain
- Manual transmission widely available
- Wonderful T5 engine
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Losing I5 and I6 engines
- Lowered engine reliability
- MacPherson strut front suspension
- Not very powerful
- Stuck with MacPherson strut front suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.