Compare Volkswagen Passat B8 Variant vs Volkswagen Golf 6 Variant vs Kia Cee'd SW 2

Volkswagen Passat B8 Variant (3G) Station Wagon (2014-2019)

Volkswagen Golf Mk6 Variant (5K) Station Wagon (2009-2013)

Kia Cee'd SW 2 (JD) Station Wagon (2012-2018)

Volkswagen | Cars

Kia | Cars

Variants

1.4 TSI

1.4 TSI ACT

1.4 TSI ACT 4MOTION

1.4 TSI ACT DSG

1.4 TSI DSG

1.5 TSI

1.5 TSI DSG

1.6 TDI

1.6 TDI DSG

1.8 TSI DSG

2.0 BiTDI 4MOTION DSG

2.0 TDI 150PS

2.0 TDI 150PS 4MOTION

2.0 TDI 150PS DSG

2.0 TDI 190PS

2.0 TDI 190PS DSG

2.0 TDI 190PS DSG 4MOTION

2.0 TSI 220PS DSG

2.0 TSI 272PS 4MOTION DSG

2.0 TSI 280PS 4MOTION DSG

GTE

1.2 TSI 105PS

1.2 TSI 105PS DSG

1.2 TSI 85PS

1.2 TSI BMT 105PS

1.4

1.4 TSI 122PS

1.4 TSI 122PS DSG

1.4 TSI 160PS

1.4 TSI 160PS DSG

1.6

1.6 TDI 105PS

1.6 TDI 105PS 4MOTION

1.6 TDI 105PS DSG

1.6 TDI BMT 105PS

1.6 TDI BMT 105PS DSG

2.0 TDI 140PS

2.0 TDI 140PS DSG

1.0 T-GDI 100PS

1.0 T-GDI 120PS

1.4 CRDi

1.4 CVVT

1.4 CVVT Euro6

1.6 CRDi 110PS

1.6 CRDi 128PS

1.6 CRDi 128PS AT

1.6 CRDI 136PS

1.6 CRDI 136PS DCT

1.6 GDi

1.6 GDI 135PS

1.6 GDI 135PS DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1495 L / 52.8 cu-ft

528 L / 18.6 cu-ft ~ 1642 L / 58.0 cu-ft

Coolant Capacity

6.9 L / 7.3 qt

Engine Oil Capacity

5.3 L / 5.6 qt

Fuel Capacity

55.0 L / 14.5 gal

53.0 L / 14.0 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Ventilated discs, 280-300 mm

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Disc, 262-284 mm

Offroad | Approach Angle

13.3 deg

Offroad | Breakover Angle

8.8 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

11.9 deg

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

Multi-link

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Independent, spring

Multi-link

Turning Circle

11.7 m / 38.4 ft

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity

9.9 kWh (gross)

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

145 mm / 5.7 in

Size | Height

1485 mm / 58.5 in

Size | Length

4767 mm / 187.7 in

4505 mm / 177.4 in

Track Width | Rear

1508.0 mm / 59.4 in

Wheelbase

2650 mm / 104.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine

D4FB

Reviews

Neofiliac score

46%

33%

31%

Pros

Good fuel economy rating
Imposing design

Now with independent rear suspensions

Down to very low official fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Only available with small engines
PHEV nonsense
MacPherson front suspension
Loads of gadgetry

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Still uses MacPherson struts in the front

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.