Compare Volkswagen Passat B8 Variant vs Volkswagen Golf 6 Variant vs Renault Megane 3 Grand Tour

Variants
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI ACT
1.4 TSI ACT 4MOTION
1.4 TSI ACT DSG
1.4 TSI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 BiTDI 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS
2.0 TDI 150PS 4MOTION
2.0 TDI 150PS DSG
2.0 TDI 190PS
2.0 TDI 190PS DSG
2.0 TDI 190PS DSG 4MOTION
2.0 TSI 220PS DSG
2.0 TSI 272PS 4MOTION DSG
2.0 TSI 280PS 4MOTION DSG
GTE
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 85PS
1.2 TSI BMT 105PS
1.4
1.4 TSI 122PS
1.4 TSI 122PS DSG
1.4 TSI 160PS
1.4 TSI 160PS DSG
1.6
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 105PS 4MOTION
1.6 TDI 105PS DSG
1.6 TDI BMT 105PS
1.6 TDI BMT 105PS DSG
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS DSG
1.2 Energy TCe 115
1.2 Energy TCe 115 Stop&Start
1.2 Energy TCe 130 Stop&Start
1.2 TCe 130 Stop&Start AT
1.4 TCe 130
1.5 dCi 105
1.5 dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 dCi 110
1.5 dCi 110 AT
1.5 dCi 90
1.5 dCi 95
1.5 Energy dCi 110 Stop&Start
1.5 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.6 100
1.6 110
1.6 110 Ethanol
1.6 Energy dCi 130 Stop&Start
1.9 dCi 130
2.0 140 CVT
2.0 dCi 150 AT
GT 2.0 dCi
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe 190 Stop&Start
GT 2.0 TCe 220 Stop&Start

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1495 L / 52.8 cu-ft
524 L / 18.5 cu-ft ~ 1595 L / 56.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.3 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
11.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.1 m / 36.2 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
9.9 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
120 mm / 4.7 in
Size | Length
4767 mm / 187.7 in
4559 mm / 179.5 in
Track Width | Front
1546.0 mm / 60.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1508.0 mm / 59.4 in
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2703 mm / 106.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.32

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
46%
33%
13%
Pros
  • Good fuel economy rating
  • Imposing design
  • Now with independent rear suspensions
  • Low official fuel consumption
  • Easy to DIY
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • PHEV nonsense
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Loads of gadgetry
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Still uses MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.