Compare Volkswagen Golf 7 Variant vs Volkswagen Golf 4 Variant vs Chevrolet HHR

Volkswagen Golf Mk7 Variant (AU) Station Wagon (2012-2017)

Volkswagen Golf Mk4 Variant (1J) Station Wagon (1999-2006)

Volkswagen | Cars

Chevrolet | Cars

Variants

1.0 TSI BlueMotion

1.0 TSI BlueMotion DSG

1.2 TSI 105PS

1.2 TSI 105PS DSG

1.2 TSI 110PS

1.2 TSI 110PS DSG

1.2 TSI 85PS

1.4 TGI BlueMotion

1.4 TGI BlueMotion DSG

1.4 TSI 122PS

1.4 TSI 122PS DSG

1.4 TSI 125PS

1.4 TSI 125PS DSG

1.4 TSI 140PS

1.4 TSI 140PS DSG

1.4 TSI 150PS

1.4 TSI 150PS DSG

1.6 TDI 105PS

1.6 TDI 105PS 4MOTION

1.6 TDI 105PS DSG

1.6 TDI 110PS

1.6 TDI 110PS 4MOTION

1.6 TDI 110PS BlueMotion

1.6 TDI 110PS DSG

1.6 TDI 90PS

2.0 TDI

2.0 TDI 4MOTION

2.0 TDI DSG

GTD

GTD DSG

1.4

1.6 101PS

1.6 101PS AT

1.6 105PS

1.6 FSI

1.8 4motion

1.9 SDI

1.9 TDI 101PS

1.9 TDI 101PS 4motion

1.9 TDI 101PS AT

1.9 TDI 110PS

1.9 TDI 110PS AT

1.9 TDI 115PS

1.9 TDI 115PS 4motion

1.9 TDI 130PS

1.9 TDI 130PS 4motion

1.9 TDI 90PS

1.9 TDI 90PS 4motion

2.0

2.0 4motion

2.0 AT

2.3 VR5

2.3 VR5 4motion

2.8 VR6 4motion

2.2

2.2 AT

2.4

2.4 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

638 L / 22.5 cu-ft ~ 1785 L / 63.0 cu-ft

Engine Oil Capacity

4.7 L / 5.0 qt

Fuel Capacity

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

49.0 L / 12.9 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent

Tire Size

215/55 R16

Turning Circle

10.9 m / 35.8 ft

10.0 m / 32.8 ft

11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height

1603 mm / 63.1 in

Size | Length

4475 mm / 176.2 in

Size | Width

1755 mm / 69.1 in

Track Width | Front

1491.0 mm / 58.7 in

Track Width | Rear

1491.0 mm / 58.7 in

Wheel Size

6.5J X 16

Wheelbase

2628 mm / 103.5 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 6

Euro 4

Production

Availability

2005 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score

22%

37%

Pros

Down to very low 3.5L/100km fuel consumption

Small turning circle
Interesting VR5 and VR6 engines

Nothing

Cons

No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
Somewhat ugly

Bad 0-100kph time
No fully independent suspension

Exceptionally ugly
No powerful engine options
No independent suspensions
Outdated transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.