Compare Volkswagen Golf 6 Variant vs Renault Talisman Grandtour vs Renault Megane 2 Grand Tour

Variants
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 85PS
1.2 TSI BMT 105PS
1.4
1.4 TSI 122PS
1.4 TSI 122PS DSG
1.4 TSI 160PS
1.4 TSI 160PS DSG
1.6
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 105PS 4MOTION
1.6 TDI 105PS DSG
1.6 TDI BMT 105PS
1.6 TDI BMT 105PS DSG
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS DSG
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL AT
1.3 TCe AT
1.5 ENERGY dCi 110PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS AT
1.6 ENERGY dCi 160PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 150PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 200PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS 4CONTROL
1.8 TCe 225PS 4CONTROL AT
1.8 TCe 225PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS AT
1.4 98PS
1.5 dCi 100PS
1.5 dCi 100PS AT
1.5 dCi 106PS
1.5 dCi 82PS
1.5 dCi 86PS
1.6 112PS
1.6 112PS AT
1.6 113PS
1.6 113PS AT
1.9 dCi 110PS
1.9 dCi 120PS
1.9 dCi 130PS
1.9 dCi 90PS
2.0 135PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1495 L / 52.8 cu-ft
520 L / 18.4 cu-ft ~ 1600 L / 56.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.3 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
11.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1467 mm / 57.8 in
Size | Length
4866 mm / 191.6 in
4500 mm / 177.2 in
Size | Width
1870 mm / 73.6 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1890 mm / 74.4 in (mirror folded)
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2026 mm / 79.8 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1508.0 mm / 59.4 in
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
1514.0 mm / 59.6 in
Wheelbase
2809 mm / 110.6 in
2686 mm / 105.7 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Reviews

Neofiliac score
33%
21%
13%
Pros
  • Now with independent rear suspensions
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Looks better than the car is
  • Much better looking than the sedan
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Still uses MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.