Compare Skoda Octavia 3 Combi vs Skoda Octavia 4 Combi vs Peugeot 308 SW III
Variants
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 86PS
1.4 G-TEC
1.4 G-TEC DSG
1.4 TSI 140PS
1.4 TSI 140PS DSG
1.4 TSI 150PS
1.4 TSI 150PS DSG
1.6 TDI 105PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 105PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS
1.6 TDI 110PS 4x4
1.6 TDI 110PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS GreenLine
1.6 TDI 90PS
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4 DSG
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS 4x4
2.0 TDI 150PS
2.0 TDI 150PS DSG
2.0 TDI 184PS 4x4 DSG
RS 2.0 TDI
RS 2.0 TDI DSG
RS 2.0 TFSI 220PS
RS 2.0 TFSI 220PS DSG
RS 2.0 TFSI 230PS
RS 2.0 TFSI 230PS DSG
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.4 PHEV 204 DSG
1.5 TSI 130
1.5 TSI 130 DSG
1.5 TSI 150
1.5 TSI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
RS
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
13.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1444 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1814 mm / 71.4 in
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheelbase
2732 mm / 107.6 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.277
Electric Range
70.0 km / 43.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Production
Availability
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
36%
31%
Pros
- Very low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low official fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Somewhat ugly
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.