HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Avensis 3 Wagon vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Opel Vectra C Caravan

Variants
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.2 D-4D
2.2 D-4D AT
2.2 D-CAT
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.6
1.8 122PS
1.8 122PS AT
1.8 140PS
1.9 CDTI 120PS
1.9 CDTI 150PS
2.0 DTI
2.0 Turbo
2.2 DTI
2.2 DTI AT
2.2 DIRECT
2.2 DIRECT Automatic
2.8 Turbo 230PS
2.8 250PS
3.0 CDTI 184PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS
3.0 CDTI 177PS AT
3.2 211PS AT
3.2 211PS
OPC 2.8 Turbo

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
543 L / 19.2 cu-ft ~ 1609 L / 56.8 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft ~ 1850 L / 65.3 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
GM Epsilon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4765 mm / 187.6 in
4595 mm / 180.9 in
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1798 mm / 70.8 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1536.0 mm / 60.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1525.0 mm / 60.0 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2830 mm / 111.4 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
222 g/km

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 6 W
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2011
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
34%
30%
27%
Pros
  • Improved suspension setup
  • Newer automatic transmission
  • More fuel efficient
  • Elegant styling
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Better-looking than the sedan
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Semi-independent suspensions in the rear
  • Use of CVT

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.