HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Renault Talisman Grandtour vs Renault Laguna 3 Estate

Variants
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.3 TCe 4CONTROL AT
1.3 TCe AT
1.5 ENERGY dCi 110PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS
1.6 ENERGY dCi 130PS AT
1.6 ENERGY dCi 160PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 150PS AT
1.6 ENERGY TCe 200PS AT
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS
1.7 Blue dCi 150PS 4CONTROL
1.8 TCe 225PS 4CONTROL AT
1.8 TCe 225PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 160PS AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS 4CONTROL AT
2.0 Blue dCi 200PS AT
1.5 dCi
1.5 dCi Euro5
1.5 dCi AT
1.6
2.0 140PS
2.0 140PS Euro5
2.0 Turbo AT
2.0 dCi 130PS Euro5
2.0 dCi 130PS
2.0 dCi 150PS
2.0 dCi 150PS AT
2.0 dCi 173PS
2.0 dCi 178PS AT
GT 150PS
GT 173PS AT
GT 173PS

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Semi-independent
Semi-independent
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4866 mm / 191.6 in
4803 mm / 189.1 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1870 mm / 73.6 in | 2081 mm / 81.9 in (mirror unfolded) | 1890 mm / 74.4 in (mirror folded)
1811 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1614.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2809 mm / 110.6 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
30%
21%
19%
Pros
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Looks better than the car is
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • No independent rear suspension
  • No fully independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.