HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Mazda 6 II Wagon facelift vs Mazda 6 II Wagon

Variants
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2 CD 129PS
2.2 CD 163PS
2.2 CD 180PS
1.8
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 CD 140PS
2.2 CD 163PS
2.2 CD 185PS
2.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
519 L / 18.3 cu-ft ~ 1751 L / 61.8 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 299 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 280 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
205/60 R16, 215/50 R17, 225/45 R18
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
165 mm / 6.5 in
165 mm / 6.5 in
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
Size | Length
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4785 mm / 188.4 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
1795 mm / 70.7 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17, 7.5J x 18
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018
2010 ~ 2012
2007 ~ 2010

Reviews

Neofiliac score
30%
46%
42%
Pros
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Somehow more elegant than pre-facelift
  • Great engines
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good engline reliability
  • Improved interior
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Slightly less beautiful than Mk1

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.