Compare Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Volkswagen Passat B6 Variant vs Toyota Venza AV10 facelift

Variants
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI BMT
1.4 TSI BMT DSG
1.4 TSI DSG
1.4 TSI EcoFuel
1.4 TSI EcoFuel DSG
1.6 FSI AT
1.6
1.6 TDI BMT
1.6 FSI
1.6 FSI AT
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
1.8 TSI AT
1.9 TDI PDE
2.0 FSI 4MOTION
2.0 TDI 110PS
2.0 TDI 110PS BlueMotion
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS 4MOTION
2.0 TDI 140PS DSG
2.0 TDI 170PS
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG
2.0 TDI 170PS PDE
2.0 TDI 170PS PDE DSG
2.0 TDI 16V 140PS PDE
2.0 TDI 16V 140PS PDE 4MOTION
2.0 TDI 16V 140PS PDE DSG
2.0 TDI 8V 140PS PDE
2.0 TDI 8V 140PS PDE 4MOTION
2.0 TDI 8V 140PS PDE DSG
2.0 FSI 150PS
2.0 FSI 150PS AT
2.0 TFSI 200PS
2.0 TFSI 200PS AT
3.2 FSI 4MOTION
R36 4MOTION
2.7
2.7 AWD
3.5
3.5 AWD

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
67.0 L / 17.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 297 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
10.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.7 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
MacPherson
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
12.4 m / 40.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon
Platform
Toyota K

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
114 mm / 4.5 in
206 mm / 8.1 in
Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
1610 mm / 63.4 in
Size | Length
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4801 mm / 189.0 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1905 mm / 75.0 in
Track Width | Front
1631.0 mm / 64.2 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2709 mm / 106.7 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
ULEV-II
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018
2012 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
30%
47%
24%
Pros
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Still available with a couple of VR6 engines
  • Reliable engines
  • Simple, clean design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Suspension downgrade
  • Transversely-mounted engine
  • Troublesome DSG transmissions
  • Basic suspension setup

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.