Compare Skoda Superb B6 vs Skoda Octavia 4 vs Volvo S90 facelift
Variants
1.4 TSI
1.6 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4
1.8 TSI DSG
1.9 TDI
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 170PS
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG 4x4
2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI DSG 4x4
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc, 322 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc, 320 mm
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.5 deg
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.0 deg
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
11.6 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
139 mm / 5.5 in
143 mm / 5.6 in
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4838 mm / 190.5 in
4969 mm / 195.6 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2761 mm / 108.7 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30
0.26 ~ 0.29
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
60%
37%
64%
Pros
- Rather clean exterior styling
- Very competitive vis-a-vis B6/B7 Passat
- Interesting engine lineup
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- FSI problems
- DSG problems
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.