Compare Dodge Charger 6 vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback vs Ford Taurus 6

Variants
R/T 5.7 345PS
R/T 5.7 345PS AWD
R/T 5.7 355PS
R/T 5.7 375PS
R/T 5.7 375PS AWD
SE 2.7 181PS
SE 2.7 192PS
STR-8
SXT 3.5
SXT 3.5 AWD
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 160
1.5 EcoBoost 160 AT
1.5D 120
1.6D 115
2.0 EcoBoost 203 AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 180
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 210 AT
AWD
FWD
SHO

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
255/45 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
12.1 m / 39.5 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1479 mm / 58.2 in
1482 mm / 58.3 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
Size | Length
5082 mm / 200.1 in
4871 mm / 191.8 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
Size | Width
1891 mm / 74.4 in
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1600.0 mm / 63.0 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
19 in
Wheelbase
3048 mm / 120.0 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3

Powertrain

Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic 6F50

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
68%
38%
21%
Pros
  • Wonderful SRT-8
  • Return of the HEMI V8
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Increased power output
  • Better interior appointments
  • More imposing exterior design
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Somewhat outdated automatic transmissions
  • Questionable design choices
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Limited by its basic suspension setup
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Unreliable engines (internal water pump)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.