Compare Infiniti Q70 vs Saab 9-5 facelift 2 vs Saab 9-5 II

Variants
M30d
M35h
M37
M37x
M56
M56x
1.9 TiD
1.9 TiD AT
2.0t
2.0t AT
Aero
Aero AT
2.3t
2.3t AT
2.3T
2.3T AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.8T XWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
513 L / 18.1 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
7.4 L / 7.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.7 L / 6.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
455 kg / 1003 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 308 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 286 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Battery | Voltage
346.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
GM Epsilon II LWB

Dimensions

Size | Height
1448 mm / 57.0 in
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4945 mm / 194.7 in
4836 mm / 190.4 in
5009 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1792 mm / 70.6 in | 2070 mm / 81.5 in (mirror unfolded)
2113 mm / 83.2 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1528.0 mm / 60.2 in
Weight
1885.0 kg / 4155.7 lbs
Wheelbase
2900 mm / 114.2 in
2703 mm / 106.4 in
2837 mm / 111.7 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
6.9 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
6.6 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
13.8 L/100km / 17.0 MPG (urban) | 8.7 L/100km / 27.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
249.0 km/h / 154.7 mph
Towing Capacity
2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.3:1
9.5:1
Transmission | Gears
7-speed
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
DCT

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
87%
26%
35%
Pros
  • Powerful and reliable NA V6 and V8 engines
  • Fantastic styling
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • RWD as standard (though lots of AWD nonsense was sold)
  • Improved suspension setup
  • Engine uprated
  • Styling ahead of its time
  • Good fit and finish
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good appointments inside
Cons
  • Getting dirty with diesel and hybrid
  • Series discontinued
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No styling improvement
  • Discontinuation of V8
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.