Compare Acura TL 4 facelift vs Acura TLX vs Acura 3.5RL

Variants
3.5
3.7 SH-AWD MT
3.7 SH-AWD
2.4
3.5
3.5 SH-AWD
1995-2001
2001-2004

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
374 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
8.6 L / 9.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
4.6 L / 4.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
505 kg / 1113 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1452 mm / 57.2 in
1448 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Length
4928 mm / 194.0 in
4834 mm / 190.3 in
Size | Width
1880 mm / 74.0 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1620.0 mm / 63.8 in
1603.0 mm / 63.1 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheelbase
2775 mm / 109.3 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2910 mm / 114.6 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
8.0 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.6 sec
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
C35A
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
9.6:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.6 cu-in / 3500.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
80.0 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2014
2014 ~ 2017

Reviews

Neofiliac score
49%
35%
14%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • New SH-AWD all-wheel drive system
  • Sweet 6-speed manual
  • Reliable V6 engines
  • Much better 8- and 9-speed automatic transmissions
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Some styling improvements
  • Proven to be very reliable
Cons
  • Downgraded to MacPherson struts
  • Lost manual transmission
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Generic styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.