Compare Honda Accord 9 (CR/CT) vs Skoda Superb B6 (3T) vs Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift

Honda Accord 9 (CR/CT)

Skoda Superb B6 (3T)

Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift

Honda Accord 9 (CR/CT)Skoda Superb B6 (3T)Skoda Superb 3 B8 (3V) facelift
Variants
2.0 PHEV
2.4
2.4 CVT
3.5
3.5 AT
1.4 TSI
1.6 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4
1.8 TSI DSG
1.9 TDI
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 170PS
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG 4x4
2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI DSG 4x4
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV

Reviews

Neofiliac score25%60%42%
Pros
  • Superb exterior styling
  • Rather clean exterior styling
  • Very competitive vis-a-vis B6/B7 Passat
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
Cons
  • Downgrade of suspension setup
  • Wide use of CVTs
  • No longer built with enthusiasts in mind
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • FSI problems
  • DSG problems
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
RemoveRemoveRemove
Add up to 3 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on a best effort basis. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac respects your privacy. We do not track your activity on this website.