Compare Lexus ES 300 XV20 vs Ford Mondeo 2 Liftback vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan
Variants
1.8 110
1.8 125
1.8 130
2.0 145
2.0 145 AT
2.0D 115
2.0D 115 AT
2.0D 90
2.0D 130
2.0D 130 AT
2.2D 155
2.5 170
2.5 170 AT
3.0 204
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 125hp
1.6T 150hp
1.6T 182hp
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp start/stop
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp start/stop
1.6T AT
2.0D 140hp
2.0D 140hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
370 L / 13.1 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft ~ 1370 L / 48.4 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
270 kg / 595 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/70 R15
205/55 R16
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Liftback Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1370 mm / 53.9 in
1429 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4830 mm / 190.2 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
Size | Width
1790 mm / 70.5 in
1812 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Weight
1495.0 kg / 3295.9 lbs
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2670 mm / 105.1 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
7.7 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
7.3 sec
Fuel Economy
11.8 L/100km / 19.9 MPG (urban) | 8.4 L/100km / 28.0 MPG (highway)
Top Speed
225.0 km/h / 139.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine
1MZ-FE
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.8 cu-in / 2995.0 cc
Engine | Power
223.0 hp / 166.3 kW @ 5800 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
74.5 hp/L / 1.2 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
301 Nm / 222.0 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
170 Nm / 125.4 lb-ft
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
1997 ~ 2001
2010 ~ 2014
Reviews
Neofiliac score
22%
29%
8%
Pros
- Exceptionally reliable
- Lots of room inside
- Good value for money
- Easy to work on
- Cute exterior design
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Uninspiring styling
- Bad handling
- Basic suspension setup
- MacPherson strut front suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Questionable automatic transmission
- NVH issues
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.