Compare Lexus LS430 UCF31 vs Jaguar XJ X308 vs Lexus LS 400 XF21
Variants
LS430 EU
LS430 US
XJ8 3.2
XJ8 4.0
XJ8 4.0 Sovereign (LWB)
XJR
LS 400
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
570 L / 20.1 cu-ft
463 L / 16.4 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
6.5 L / 6.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
84.0 L / 22.2 gal
81.0 L / 21.4 gal
85.0 L / 22.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
430 kg / 948 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 315 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 310 mm
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
225/55 R17
225/60 R16
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
145 mm / 5.7 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4995 mm / 196.7 in
Size | Width
1830 mm / 72.0 in
1799 mm / 70.8 in
1830 mm / 72.0 in
Track Width | Front
1500.0 mm / 59.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1498.0 mm / 59.0 in
Wheel Size
7.5J x 17
7J x 16
Wheelbase
2925 mm / 115.2 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
270 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2000 kg / 4409 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
3UZ-FE
1UZ-FE
Engine | Bore
91.0 mm / 3.6 in
86.0 mm / 3.4 in
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
4.3 L / 262.0 cu-in / 4293.0 cc
4.0 L / 242.2 cu-in / 3969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
82.5 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V8 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
1997 ~ 2003
Reviews
Neofiliac score
82%
87%
75%
Pros
- Exceptionally robust powertrain
- Simple yet elegant styling
- Good fit and finish
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
- Best-in-class styling
- Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
- Great fit and finish
- Wonderful Supercharged V8 engine
- Elegant styling
- Best-in-class build quality
- Exceptionally-reliable powertrain
- Double-wishbone suspensions all-around
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
Cons
- Starting to be down on power compared to its European competition
- Engine not the most reliable
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.