HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes S-class W222 vs Mercedes CLA C117 facelift vs Mercedes A-Class Sedan V177

Variants
AMG S 63
AMG S 63 L 4MATIC
AMG S 65 L
S 300h BlueTEC
S 300h L BlueTEC
S 320 L
S 350 BlueTEC
S 350 BlueTEC 4MATIC
S 350 L BlueTEC
S 350 L BlueTEC 4MATIC
S 350d
S 350d 4MATIC
S 400 4MATIC
S 400h
S 400h L
S 500
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 4MATIC 9AT
S 500 9AT
S 500 L
S 500 L 4MATIC
S 500e L
S 600 L
CLA 45 AMG
CLA 180
CLA 180 DCT
CLA 180d
CLA 180d DCT
CLA 200
CLA 200 DCT
CLA 200d
CLA 200d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 200d DCT
CLA 220 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d 4MATIC DCT
CLA 220d DCT
CLA 250
CLA 250 4MATIC DCT
CLA 250 DCT
A 180
A 180d DCT
A 200
A 200 4MATIC DCT
A 200 DCT
A 200d
A 200d 4MATIC DCT
A 220 4MATIC DCT
A 220d 4MATIC DCT
A 220d DCT
A 250 4MATIC DCT
A 250 DCT
A 250e DCT
AMG A 35 4MATIC DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
470 L / 16.6 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
15.5 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Coupe

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Height
1432 mm / 56.4 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4640 mm / 182.7 in
4549 mm / 179.1 in
Size | Width
1777 mm / 70.0 in | 2032 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1567.0 mm / 61.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1547.0 mm / 60.9 in
Wheelbase
2699 mm / 106.3 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in

Performance

Electric Range
33.0 km / 20.5 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Euro 6

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
98%
22%
36%
Pros
  • M279 made the V12 bi-turbo even more reliable
  • Predictive MBC hydraulic suspension replaced ABC
  • Powerful and robust M278/M157 V8
  • All engines still available with RWD
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Generic exterior styling
  • Too many displays inside
  • Small engines
  • Ugly hunchback styling
  • Build quality concerns
  • FWD platform
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.