Compare Mercedes S-class W220 facelift vs Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volvo S80

Variants
S 320 CDI
S 350
S 350 4MATIC
S 350 4MATIC
S 350 L
S 400 CDI
S 400 CDI L
S 430
S 430 4MATIC
S 430 4MATIC L
S 430 7AT
S 430 L
S 430 L 7AT
S 500
S 500 4MATIC
S 500 7AT
S 500 L
S 500 L 7AT
S 55 AMG
S 55 AMG L
S 600 L
S 65 AMG
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
2.0T 163hp
2.0T 163hp AT
2.0T 180hp
2.0T 180hp AT
2.0T 226hp
2.0T 226hp AT
2.4 140hp
2.4 140hp AT
2.4 170hp
2.4 170hp AT
2.4D 130hp
2.4D 163hp
2.4D 163hp AT
2.4T 200hp
2.5D 140hp
2.8T 272hp
2.9 196hp
2.9 200hp
2.9 204hp
2.9 204hp AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Suspension | Rear
Helical spring
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1560.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 2100 kg / 4630 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Redline
6400 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
94%
61%
21%
Pros
  • Awe-inspiring 612hp + 1000Nm in the S65 AMG
  • Overall robust and powerful drivetrains
  • Further improved exterior styling
  • Superb suspension setup
  • Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
  • Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Compact I6 engine for FWD
  • Sweet I5 engine options
  • Classy exterior design
  • Great safety record
  • Solid build quality
Cons
  • Horrendous ABC reliability in higher-end models
  • 4MATIC started to appear
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Nothing exciting

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.