Compare Mercedes C-class W203 facelift vs Ford Mondeo 4 Liftback vs Ford Focus 3 Sedan facelift
Variants
C 30 CDI AMG
C 55 AMG
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 Kompressor
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI DPF
C 200 CDI DPF MT
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 Kompressor
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI DPF
C 220 CDI DPF MT
C 230 MT
C 230
C 230 Kompressor MT US
C 230 Kompressor US
C 230 Kompressor MT
C 240 MT
C 240 4MATIC
C 240
C 270 CDI MT
C 270 CDI
C 280 MT
C 280 4MATIC
C 280
C 320 MT
C 320 4MATIC
C 320
C 320 CDI MT
C 320 CDI
C 350 MT
C 350 4MATIC
C 350
1.0 EcoBoost 125
1.5 EcoBoost 160
1.5 EcoBoost 160 AT
1.5D 120
1.6D 115
2.0 EcoBoost 203 AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240 AT
2.0D 150
2.0D 150 AWD
2.0D 150 AT
2.0D 180
2.0D 180 AT
2.0D 180 AWD AT
2.0D 210 AT
1.0T 100hp
1.0T 100hp stop/start
1.0T 125hp
1.0T 125hp stop/start
1.5D 120hp
1.5D 95hp
1.5T 150hp
1.5T 150hp stop/start
1.5T 182hp
1.5T 182hp stop/start
1.6D 115hp
1.6D 115hp stop/start
1.6D 95hp
1.6D 95hp stop/start
1.6T 105hp
1.6T 125hp
1.6T 125hp AT
1.6T 85hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 150hp AT stop/start
2.0D 150hp stop/start
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
372 L / 13.1 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
62.5 L / 16.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
205/55 R16, 215/50 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1482 mm / 58.3 in
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4871 mm / 191.8 in
4534 mm / 178.5 in
Size | Width
1823 mm / 71.8 in
Track Width | Front
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
6.5J x 16, 7.0J x 17
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2648 mm / 104.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
39.0 m / 127.9 ft
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
76%
38%
22%
Pros
- Reintroduction of C55 AMG
- Slightly less rusty
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Good towing capacity
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Down to very low 3.8L/100km fuel consumption (if we believe it)
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Troublesome 7G-Tronic transmission
- Non-AMG models still looked "off"
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.