HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes C-class W203 facelift vs Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volvo S40

Variants
C 30 CDI AMG
C 55 AMG
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 Kompressor
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI DPF
C 200 CDI DPF MT
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 Kompressor
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI DPF
C 220 CDI DPF MT
C 230 MT
C 230
C 230 Kompressor MT US
C 230 Kompressor US
C 230 Kompressor MT
C 240 MT
C 240 4MATIC
C 240
C 270 CDI MT
C 270 CDI
C 280 MT
C 280 4MATIC
C 280
C 320 MT
C 320 4MATIC
C 320
C 320 CDI MT
C 320 CDI
C 350 MT
C 350 4MATIC
C 350
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
15 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
39.0 m / 127.9 ft
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
76%
61%
17%
Pros
  • Reintroduction of C55 AMG
  • Slightly less rusty
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
  • Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Solid safety rating
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Troublesome 7G-Tronic transmission
  • Non-AMG models still looked "off"
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable design
  • Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.