Compare Mercedes C-class W203 vs Toyota Corolla 11 vs Toyota Mirai

Variants
C 30 CDI AMG
C 32 AMG
C 180 MT
C 180
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 Kompressor
C 200 CDI 116hp MT
C 200 CDI 116hp
C 200 CDI 122hp MT
C 200 CDI 122hp
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 Kompressor MT 02+
C 200 Kompressor
C 200 Kompressor 02+
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 CDI MT 03+
C 220 CDI 03+
C 220 CDI
C 240 MT
C 240 4MATIC
C 240
C 270 CDI MT
C 270 CDI
C 320 MT
C 320 4MATIC
C 320
1.33
1.4 D-4D
1.6
1.6 CVT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
455 L / 16.1 cu-ft
452 L / 16.0 cu-ft
361 L / 12.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
4
Payload
330 kg / 728 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Torsion
Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
255/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door hydrogen fuel cell Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
125 mm / 4.9 in
130 mm / 5.1 in
Size | Height
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1535 mm / 60.4 in
Size | Length
4620 mm / 181.9 in
4890 mm / 192.5 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1810 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Weight
1850.0 kg / 4078.6 lbs
Wheel Size
15 in, 16 in
17 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.6 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
9.1 sec
Braking | 200 km/h - 0
142.5 m / 467.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.29
Top Speed
175.0 km/h / 108.7 mph

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Engine | Power
154 hp / 114.8 kW @ 6144 rpm
Engine | Type
hydrogen engine
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
e-CVT

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2019
2014 ~ 2020

Reviews

Neofiliac score
59%
21%
44%
Pros
  • Rather reliable diesel engine range
  • Great 5G-TRONIC auto box
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • The world's first fuel cell vehicle
  • Powered by zero-emission hydrogen fuel cell
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Cons
  • RUST
  • Loss of V8
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable styling
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Symbol of boring
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Poor handling characteristics

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.