HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes C-class W202 facelift vs Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volvo S40

Variants
C 180
C 180 MT
C 200
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 D
C 200 D MT
C 200 Kompressor
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 D
C 220 D MT
C 230
C 230 Kompressor
C 230 Kompressor MT
C 230 MT
C 240
C 240 MT
C 250 Turbodiesel
C 250 Turbodiesel MT
C 280
C 280 MT
C 43 AMG
C 55 AMG
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
1.6 105hp MT
1.6 105hp AT
1.6 109hp MT
1.8 115hp MT
1.8 115hp AT
1.8 122hp MT
1.8 GDI MT
1.9D 115hp MT
1.9D 102hp MT
1.9T MT
1.9T AT
1.9D 90hp MT
2.0 136hp MT
2.0 140hp MT
2.0 140hp AT
2.0T 160hp MT
2.0T 160hp AT
2.0T 165hp MT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
10.7 m / 35.2 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4516 mm / 177.8 in
4635 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1723 mm / 67.8 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
15 in
Wheelbase
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Rear-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
5-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
78%
61%
17%
Pros
  • Amazing M113 engines in the C43 and C55 AMGs
  • Robust 5G-TRONIC transmission
  • Clean, elegant styling
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good towing capacity
  • Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
  • Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Solid safety rating
Cons
  • Non-AMG models not so good looking
  • Lethargic diesels
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Questionable design
  • Not the best years of Volvo under Ford

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.