Compare Toyota Camry 7 facelift vs Toyota Camry 6 vs Toyota Camry 8
Variants
2.0 AT
2.5 178hp AT
2.5 181hp AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5 250hp AT
3.5 268hp AT
2.4 158hp
2.4 158hp AT
2.4 167hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
3.5 268hp AT
3.5 277hp AT
2.0
2.5 6AT
2.5 8AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5
Capacity
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
155 mm / 6.1 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
127 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 18 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
98 ~ 101 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2014 ~ 2017
2006 ~ 2009
Reviews
Neofiliac score
43%
42%
44%
Pros
- Very robust engine lineup
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Superb long-term reliability
- Robust engine options
- Proven to be exceptionally reliable
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- High reliability
- Good comfort
- Decent handling
Cons
- Controversial styling
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bland styling
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.